PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3GDE.L achieves a -67.70% return, which is significantly lower than DEL2.L's -2.00% return.


3GDE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-50.45%
6M
-76.88%
YTD
-67.70%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DEL2.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.52%
6M
-7.87%
YTD
-2.00%
1Y
-4.25%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3GDE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR
-67.70%690.23%-18.68%
DEL2.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-2.00%37.26%16.37%

Correlation

The correlation between 3GDE.L and DEL2.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3GDE.L
3GDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
3GDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
3GDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DEL2.L
DEL2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DEL2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEL2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3GDE.LDEL2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.01

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

-0.16

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.40

-0.49

+0.88

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3GDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the DEL2.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3GDE.L and DEL2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3GDE.L drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, which is greater than DEL2.L's maximum drawdown of -64.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3GDE.L and DEL2.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3GDE.LDEL2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.22%

-64.67%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.22%

-26.77%

-57.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.22%

-8.93%

-75.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.37%

-16.34%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.49%

8.70%

+34.79%

Volatility

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Gold Miners ETC EUR (3GDE.L) has a higher volatility of 44.40% compared to L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DEL2.L) at 9.34%. This indicates that 3GDE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEL2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3GDE.LDEL2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.40%

9.34%

+35.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

116.89%

27.89%

+89.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

142.91%

33.05%

+109.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

119.49%

34.40%

+85.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.49%

36.20%

+83.29%

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3GDE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DEL2.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

3GDE.L vs. DEL2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3GDE.L nor DEL2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3GDE.L and DEL2.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DEL2.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DEL2.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3GDE.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3GDE.L and 0.40% for DEL2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3GDE.L and DEL2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer