PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3CON.L vs. QQQY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3CON.L is traded in GBp, while QQQY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3CON.L achieves a -87.66% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY.L's 14.95% return.


3CON.L

1D
-22.83%
1M
-57.54%
YTD
-87.66%
6M
-92.40%
1Y
-96.32%
3Y*
-60.03%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
6.35%
YTD
14.95%
6M
13.46%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between 3CON.L and QQQY.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3CON.L
3CON.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
3CON.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3CON.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
3CON.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
3CON.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
3CON.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3CON.LQQQY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.43

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

5.11

-6.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

12.98

-14.19

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3CON.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3CON.L and QQQY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3CON.LQQQY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

2.35

-2.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.63

-0.63

Drawdowns

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3CON.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than QQQY.L's maximum drawdown of -22.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3CON.L and QQQY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3CON.LQQQY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-22.98%

-77.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.03%

-6.17%

-92.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.83%

-1.33%

-98.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.89%

-5.39%

-74.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

79.86%

2.44%

+77.42%

Volatility

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) has a higher volatility of 58.26% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) at 4.84%. This indicates that 3CON.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3CON.LQQQY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

58.26%

4.84%

+53.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

141.15%

10.41%

+130.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

200.92%

13.41%

+187.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,473,844.36%

21.84%

+1,473,822.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,473,844.36%

21.84%

+1,473,822.52%

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3CON.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

3CON.L vs. QQQY.L - Dividend Comparison

3CON.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


3CON.L and QQQY.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3CON.L.

3CON.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQY.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3CON.L and 0.45% for QQQY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3CON.L and QQQY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer