PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3CON.L vs. DL2P.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3CON.L achieves a -88.53% return, which is significantly lower than DL2P.L's -4.61% return.


3CON.L

1D
-15.17%
1M
-31.82%
6M
-89.00%
YTD
-88.53%
1Y
-98.91%
3Y*
-79.15%
5Y*
10Y*

DL2P.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
-3.28%
6M
-9.64%
YTD
-4.61%
1Y
-5.87%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
13.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3CON.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP
-88.53%-89.33%-75.96%1,063.69%36.77%0.37%
DL2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-4.61%44.27%25.79%31.85%-23.59%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between 3CON.L and DL2P.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3CON.L
3CON.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
3CON.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3CON.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
3CON.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
3CON.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
3CON.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

DL2P.L
DL2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DL2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DL2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


3CON.LDL2P.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.99

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-0.25

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-0.69

-0.45

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3CON.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the DL2P.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3CON.L and DL2P.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3CON.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than DL2P.L's maximum drawdown of -63.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3CON.L and DL2P.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3CON.LDL2P.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-63.02%

-36.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.22%

-23.87%

-75.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.86%

-28.21%

-71.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.84%

-10.68%

-89.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-16.32%

-64.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

86.81%

8.52%

+78.29%

Volatility

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) has a higher volatility of 48.56% compared to L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L) at 9.40%. This indicates that 3CON.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DL2P.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3CON.LDL2P.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.56%

9.40%

+39.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

145.17%

26.51%

+118.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

200.84%

31.14%

+169.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,453,861.28%

33.70%

+1,453,827.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,453,861.28%

35.50%

+1,453,825.78%

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3CON.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DL2P.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

3CON.L vs. DL2P.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3CON.L nor DL2P.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3CON.L and DL2P.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DL2P.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DL2P.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3CON.L.

3CON.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index, while DL2P.L tracks LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3CON.L and 0.40% for DL2P.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3CON.L and DL2P.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer