PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3CON.L achieves a -87.66% return, which is significantly lower than 3AMD.L's 464.05% return.


3CON.L

1D
-22.83%
1M
-57.54%
YTD
-87.66%
6M
-92.40%
1Y
-96.32%
3Y*
-60.03%
5Y*
10Y*

3AMD.L

1D
-21.50%
1M
39.81%
YTD
464.05%
6M
414.73%
1Y
1,688.40%
3Y*
34.24%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3CON.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP
-87.66%-89.33%-75.96%1,063.69%36.77%0.37%
3AMD.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP
464.05%53.76%-76.38%448.82%-97.41%23.35%

Correlation

The correlation between 3CON.L and 3AMD.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3CON.L
3CON.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
3CON.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3CON.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
3CON.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
3CON.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
3CON.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

3AMD.L
3AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3CON.L3AMD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.56

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

21.85

-22.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

40.35

-41.55

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3CON.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the 3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 8.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3CON.L and 3AMD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3CON.L3AMD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

8.77

-9.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.03

-0.03

Drawdowns

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3CON.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum 3AMD.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3CON.L and 3AMD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3CON.L3AMD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.50%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.03%

-76.34%

-22.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.83%

-97.93%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.83%

-78.66%

-21.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.89%

-83.42%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

79.86%

41.43%

+38.43%

Volatility

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Coinbase (COIN) ETP Securities GBP (3CON.L) and Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) have volatilities of 58.26% and 60.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3CON.L3AMD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

58.26%

60.95%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

141.15%

136.89%

+4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

200.92%

190.14%

+10.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,473,844.36%

158.88%

+1,473,685.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,473,844.36%

158.81%

+1,473,685.55%

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3CON.L and 3AMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3CON.L vs. 3AMD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3CON.L nor 3AMD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3CON.L and 3AMD.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3CON.L and 3AMD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3CON.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x COIN Index, while 3AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3CON.L and 3AMD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer