PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3BP.L vs. MRN3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities (MRN3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3BP.L is traded in GBp, while MRN3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MRN3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3BP.L achieves a 75.30% return, which is significantly lower than MRN3.L's 157.93% return.


3BP.L

1D
-1.59%
1M
-16.33%
YTD
75.30%
6M
37.46%
1Y
168.94%
3Y*
-2.25%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*

MRN3.L

1D
26.04%
1M
22.44%
YTD
157.93%
6M
284.71%
1Y
66.10%
3Y*
-91.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3BP.L
Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX
75.30%16.83%-49.99%-15.24%58.02%2.52%
MRN3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities
157.93%-94.12%-98.49%-93.17%-91.25%-37.81%

Correlation

The correlation between 3BP.L and MRN3.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.04

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3BP.L
MRN3.L

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

3BP.L
100.0%
MRN3.L

-

Basic Materials

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Communication Services

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Consumer Defensive

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Financial Services

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Healthcare

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L
100.0%

Industrials

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Real Estate

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Technology

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Utilities

3BP.L

-

MRN3.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3BP.L
3BP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
3BP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
3BP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MRN3.L
MRN3.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MRN3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRN3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRN3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MRN3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRN3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities (MRN3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3BP.LMRN3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

0.82

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

1.29

+10.38

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3BP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the MRN3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3BP.L and MRN3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3BP.LMRN3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

0.31

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

-0.43

+0.50

Drawdowns

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3BP.L drawdown since its inception was -85.47%, smaller than the maximum MRN3.L drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BP.L and MRN3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3BP.LMRN3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.47%

-100.00%

+14.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.67%

-80.59%

+40.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.48%

-99.99%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.91%

-100.00%

+53.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.64%

-97.58%

+53.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.42%

51.23%

-36.81%

Volatility

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) is 29.33%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities (MRN3.L) has a volatility of 57.11%. This indicates that 3BP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRN3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3BP.LMRN3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.33%

57.11%

-27.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.08%

162.60%

-88.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.97%

209.97%

-125.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.78%

220.23%

-130.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.19%

220.23%

-130.04%

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3BP.L and MRN3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3BP.L vs. MRN3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3BP.L nor MRN3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3BP.L and MRN3.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3BP.L and MRN3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3BP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x BP Index, while MRN3.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x MRNA Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3BP.L and MRN3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer