PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Alibaba ETC (3BAB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3BAB.L is traded in GBp, while 3SPY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3SPY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3BAB.L achieves a -51.03% return, which is significantly lower than 3SPY.L's 24.80% return.


3BAB.L

1D
-12.86%
1M
-14.43%
YTD
-51.03%
6M
-62.11%
1Y
-29.02%
3Y*
-22.14%
5Y*
-69.09%
10Y*

3SPY.L

1D
-0.79%
1M
15.24%
YTD
24.80%
6M
23.61%
1Y
74.64%
3Y*
38.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3BAB.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alibaba ETC
-51.03%109.01%-18.41%-64.32%-70.83%
3SPY.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities
24.80%4.37%66.60%50.33%-39.40%

Correlation

The correlation between 3BAB.L and 3SPY.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3BAB.L
3BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
3BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
3BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

3SPY.L
3SPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
3SPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alibaba ETC (3BAB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3BAB.L3SPY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

1.81

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.58

3.61

-4.19

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3BAB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the 3SPY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3BAB.L and 3SPY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3BAB.L3SPY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.36

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

0.36

-0.82

Drawdowns

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than 3SPY.L's maximum drawdown of -58.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BAB.L and 3SPY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3BAB.L3SPY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.81%

-58.02%

-41.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.29%

-41.04%

-41.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.29%

-58.02%

-24.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.75%

-7.88%

-91.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.40%

-20.57%

-72.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.68%

20.60%

+29.08%

Volatility

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Alibaba ETC (3BAB.L) has a higher volatility of 48.18% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long US 500 ETP Securities (3SPY.L) at 8.84%. This indicates that 3BAB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3SPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3BAB.L3SPY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.18%

8.84%

+39.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.83%

23.28%

+65.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

125.78%

54.71%

+71.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

149.76%

51.40%

+98.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

149.50%

51.40%

+98.10%

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3BAB.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3SPY.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

3BAB.L vs. 3SPY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3BAB.L nor 3SPY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3BAB.L and 3SPY.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3SPY.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3SPY.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3BAB.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3BAB.L and 0.01% for 3SPY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3BAB.L and 3SPY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer