3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L
3BAB.L (Leverage Shares 3x Alibaba ETC) and 2MU.L (Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3BAB.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x BABA Index while 2MU.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 2X MU Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 3BAB.L returned -69.09%/yr vs 99.54%/yr for 2MU.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3BAB.L achieves a -51.03% return, which is significantly lower than 2MU.L's 890.70% return.
3BAB.L
- 1D
- -12.86%
- 1M
- -14.43%
- YTD
- -51.03%
- 6M
- -62.11%
- 1Y
- -29.02%
- 3Y*
- -22.14%
- 5Y*
- -69.09%
- 10Y*
- —
2MU.L
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- 267.24%
- YTD
- 890.70%
- 6M
- 1,363.92%
- 1Y
- 6,514.91%
- 3Y*
- 298.47%
- 5Y*
- 99.54%
- 10Y*
- —
3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3BAB.L Leverage Shares 3x Alibaba ETC | -51.03% | 109.01% | -18.41% | -64.32% | -91.90% | -87.31% |
2MU.L Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP | 890.70% | 550.25% | -30.59% | 142.95% | -76.42% | 30.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3BAB.L and 2MU.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L — Risk / Return Rank
3BAB.L
2MU.L
3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Alibaba ETC (3BAB.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3BAB.L | 2MU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -50.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.95 | -0.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 120.42 | -120.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 429.29 | -429.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3BAB.L | 2MU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 50.34 | -50.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.46 | 0.95 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.99 | -1.45 |
Drawdowns
3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than 2MU.L's maximum drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3BAB.L and 2MU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3BAB.L | 2MU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.81% | -89.16% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.29% | -53.20% | -29.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.29% | -89.16% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.81% | -89.16% | -10.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.75% | 0.00% | -99.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.40% | -44.86% | -48.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.68% | 14.95% | +34.73% |
Volatility
3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Alibaba ETC (3BAB.L) is 48.18%, while Leverage Shares 2x Micron Technology ETC GBP (2MU.L) has a volatility of 53.51%. This indicates that 3BAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2MU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3BAB.L | 2MU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.18% | 53.51% | -5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 88.83% | 96.13% | -7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 125.78% | 127.53% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.76% | 104.70% | +45.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.50% | 100.80% | +48.70% |
3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3BAB.L and 2MU.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3BAB.L vs. 2MU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3BAB.L nor 2MU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3BAB.L and 2MU.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3BAB.L and 2MU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3BAB.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x BABA Index, while 2MU.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X MU Index.
Find the right allocation for 3BAB.L and 2MU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer