PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3ARE.L is traded in EUR, while 2NFL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2NFL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3ARE.L achieves a -10.77% return, which is significantly higher than 2NFL.L's -28.56% return.


3ARE.L

1D
10.69%
1M
11.54%
YTD
-10.77%
6M
-25.83%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
0.56%
5Y*
10Y*

2NFL.L

1D
1.85%
1M
-13.03%
YTD
-28.56%
6M
-41.15%
1Y
-64.30%
3Y*
27.12%
5Y*
-6.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3ARE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR
-10.77%-2.23%-24.41%184.23%-99.25%8.85%
2NFL.L
Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP
-28.56%-24.20%207.11%119.80%-87.78%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between 3ARE.L and 2NFL.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between 3ARE.L and 2NFL.L has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3ARE.L
2NFL.L

Healthcare

27.4%

-

Technology

26.4%

-

Financial Services

15.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.7%

-

Communication Services

10.9%
100.0%

Industrials

6.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

3ARE.L
27.4%
2NFL.L

-

Technology

3ARE.L
26.4%
2NFL.L

-

Financial Services

3ARE.L
15.4%
2NFL.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

3ARE.L
13.7%
2NFL.L

-

Communication Services

3ARE.L
10.9%
2NFL.L
100.0%

Industrials

3ARE.L
6.3%
2NFL.L

-

Basic Materials

3ARE.L

-

2NFL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

3ARE.L

-

2NFL.L

-

Energy

3ARE.L

-

2NFL.L

-

Real Estate

3ARE.L

-

2NFL.L

-

Utilities

3ARE.L

-

2NFL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3ARE.L
3ARE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
3ARE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
3ARE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

2NFL.L
2NFL.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
2NFL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3ARE.L2NFL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.79

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

-0.90

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

-1.43

+2.65

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3ARE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the 2NFL.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3ARE.L and 2NFL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3ARE.L2NFL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

-1.00

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

0.04

-0.50

Drawdowns

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3ARE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.62%, roughly equal to the maximum 2NFL.L drawdown of -96.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ARE.L and 2NFL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3ARE.L2NFL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.62%

-96.05%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.63%

-71.58%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.57%

-71.58%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.68%

-68.00%

-30.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-95.64%

-48.89%

-46.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.09%

45.02%

-2.93%

Volatility

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long ARK Innovation ETC EUR (3ARE.L) has a higher volatility of 27.63% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) at 15.30%. This indicates that 3ARE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2NFL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3ARE.L2NFL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.63%

15.30%

+12.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.98%

51.93%

+16.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.36%

64.40%

+34.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.55%

91.20%

+40.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

131.55%

86.27%

+45.28%

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3ARE.L and 2NFL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3ARE.L vs. 2NFL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3ARE.L nor 2NFL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3ARE.L and 2NFL.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3ARE.L and 2NFL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3ARE.L and 2NFL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer