PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3APE.L vs. COII.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3APE.L vs. COII.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3APE.L is traded in EUR, while COII.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the COII.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3APE.L achieves a 31.29% return, which is significantly higher than COII.L's -44.06% return.


3APE.L

1D
-1.27%
1M
34.25%
YTD
31.29%
6M
18.06%
1Y
155.84%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
24.88%
10Y*

COII.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
-12.63%
YTD
-44.06%
6M
-51.67%
1Y
-66.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3APE.L vs. COII.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3APE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR
31.29%-31.84%39.40%
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
-44.06%-50.02%16.68%

Correlation

The correlation between 3APE.L and COII.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

0.21

The correlation between 3APE.L and COII.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3APE.L vs. COII.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3APE.L
3APE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
3APE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3APE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3APE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
3APE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
3APE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

COII.L
COII.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COII.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COII.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3APE.L vs. COII.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3APE.LCOII.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.77

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

-0.89

+4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

-1.35

+9.91

3APE.L vs. COII.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3APE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the COII.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3APE.L and COII.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3APE.LCOII.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

-1.10

+3.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.82

+1.13

Drawdowns

3APE.L vs. COII.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3APE.L drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, roughly equal to the maximum COII.L drawdown of -77.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3APE.L and COII.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3APE.LCOII.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-77.16%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.29%

-74.98%

+33.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.02%

-76.04%

+63.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-35.78%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.13%

49.42%

-31.29%

Volatility

3APE.L vs. COII.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) is 15.15%, while IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) has a volatility of 15.97%. This indicates that 3APE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COII.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3APE.LCOII.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

15.97%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.36%

41.66%

+7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.52%

60.74%

+7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.99%

59.50%

+20.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.29%

59.50%

+24.79%

3APE.L vs. COII.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3APE.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COII.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

3APE.L vs. COII.L - Dividend Comparison

3APE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.73%.


PositionTTM20252024
3APE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
105.73%191.72%18.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


3APE.L and COII.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COII.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COII.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3APE.L.

3APE.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COII.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3APE.L and 0.55% for COII.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3APE.L and COII.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer