PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AME.L vs. MAG7.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3AME.L is traded in EUR, while MAG7.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAG7.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AME.L achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than MAG7.L's 0.76% return.


3AME.L

1D
6.10%
1M
-22.05%
YTD
12.32%
6M
15.92%
1Y
21.25%
3Y*
26.64%
5Y*
10Y*

MAG7.L

1D
5.07%
1M
14.01%
YTD
0.76%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
122.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3AME.L
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR
12.32%-41.33%45.85%
MAG7.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities
0.76%-36.92%162.58%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AME.L and MAG7.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.72

The correlation between 3AME.L and MAG7.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AME.L
3AME.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
3AME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
3AME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

MAG7.L
MAG7.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MAG7.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AME.LMAG7.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.71

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

4.17

-3.43

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AME.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the MAG7.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AME.L and MAG7.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AME.LMAG7.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

1.25

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.21

-0.09

Drawdowns

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AME.L drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, smaller than the maximum MAG7.L drawdown of -91.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AME.L and MAG7.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AME.LMAG7.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.29%

-91.94%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.73%

-71.21%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.36%

-51.33%

+3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.24%

-49.70%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.74%

29.23%

-0.49%

Volatility

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L) have volatilities of 27.49% and 27.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AME.LMAG7.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.49%

27.11%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.07%

71.01%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.62%

97.04%

-6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.64%

124.90%

-24.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.64%

124.90%

-24.26%

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AME.L and MAG7.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AME.L vs. MAG7.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AME.L nor MAG7.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AME.L and MAG7.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AME.L and MAG7.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3AME.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index, while MAG7.L tracks Solactive Magnificent 7 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AME.L and MAG7.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer