PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AME.L achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than 2BRE.L's -13.89% return.


3AME.L

1D
6.10%
1M
-22.05%
YTD
12.32%
6M
15.92%
1Y
21.25%
3Y*
26.64%
5Y*
10Y*

2BRE.L

1D
0.62%
1M
3.98%
YTD
-13.89%
6M
-14.34%
1Y
-18.63%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3AME.L
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR
12.32%-41.33%120.90%275.57%-71.73%
2BRE.L
Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR
-13.89%-4.91%55.13%18.25%7.56%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AME.L and 2BRE.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.13

The correlation between 3AME.L and 2BRE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AME.L
3AME.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
3AME.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AME.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AME.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
3AME.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AME.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

2BRE.L
2BRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
2BRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
2BRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AME.L2BRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.91

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

-0.82

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

-1.60

+2.34

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AME.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the 2BRE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AME.L and 2BRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AME.L2BRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

-0.66

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.30

-0.19

Drawdowns

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AME.L drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than 2BRE.L's maximum drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AME.L and 2BRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AME.L2BRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.29%

-40.62%

-45.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.73%

-22.65%

-37.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.04%

-39.67%

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.36%

-37.26%

-10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.24%

-19.10%

-27.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.74%

11.62%

+17.12%

Volatility

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC EUR (3AME.L) has a higher volatility of 27.49% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Long Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) ETC EUR (2BRE.L) at 7.24%. This indicates that 3AME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2BRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AME.L2BRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.49%

7.24%

+20.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.07%

20.36%

+49.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.62%

28.18%

+62.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.64%

37.23%

+63.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.64%

37.23%

+63.41%

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AME.L and 2BRE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AME.L vs. 2BRE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AME.L nor 2BRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AME.L and 2BRE.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AME.L and 2BRE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AME.L and 2BRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer