PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3AMD.L is traded in GBp, while SMH3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AMD.L achieves a 658.07% return, which is significantly higher than SMH3.L's 332.35% return.


3AMD.L

1D
11.54%
1M
184.55%
YTD
658.07%
6M
604.25%
1Y
2,384.13%
3Y*
51.93%
5Y*
10Y*

SMH3.L

1D
4.11%
1M
88.51%
YTD
332.35%
6M
329.59%
1Y
994.08%
3Y*
156.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3AMD.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP
658.07%53.77%-76.38%448.82%-97.41%16.75%
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
332.35%62.22%69.91%243.35%-83.36%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AMD.L and SMH3.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021

0.71

The correlation between 3AMD.L and SMH3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AMD.L
3AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AMD.LSMH3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.64

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

30.82

26.22

+4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.95

84.20

-27.25

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 12.48, which is comparable to the SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio of 10.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AMD.L and SMH3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AMD.LSMH3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48

10.77

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.55

-0.50

Drawdowns

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, which is greater than SMH3.L's maximum drawdown of -87.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMD.L and SMH3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AMD.LSMH3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.50%

-87.38%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.34%

-37.52%

-38.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.93%

-84.61%

-13.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.32%

0.00%

-71.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.94%

-47.69%

-37.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.40%

11.71%

+29.69%

Volatility

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 68.82% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) at 38.25%. This indicates that 3AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AMD.LSMH3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

68.82%

38.25%

+30.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

134.33%

69.67%

+64.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

188.76%

91.73%

+97.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

158.33%

99.02%

+59.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

158.33%

99.02%

+59.31%

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AMD.L and SMH3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AMD.L vs. SMH3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AMD.L nor SMH3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AMD.L and SMH3.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AMD.L and SMH3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AMD.L and SMH3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer