3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L
3AMD.L (Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP) and 3TSL.L (Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3AMD.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index while 3TSL.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSLA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 3AMD.L returned 2.84%/yr vs 21.15%/yr for 3TSL.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3AMD.L achieves a 508.72% return, which is significantly higher than 3TSL.L's -55.03% return.
3AMD.L
- 1D
- -15.14%
- 1M
- 13.24%
- YTD
- 508.72%
- 6M
- 499.68%
- 1Y
- 1,400.00%
- 3Y*
- 61.60%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- —
3TSL.L
- 1D
- -18.13%
- 1M
- -30.77%
- YTD
- -55.03%
- 6M
- -62.88%
- 1Y
- -37.36%
- 3Y*
- 155.80%
- 5Y*
- 21.15%
- 10Y*
- —
3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3AMD.L Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP | 508.72% | 53.76% | -76.38% | 448.82% | -97.41% | 341.88% |
3TSL.L Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX | -55.03% | -71.66% | 25.48% | 51,227.74% | -98.76% | 274.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3AMD.L and 3TSL.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2021 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L — Risk / Return Rank
3AMD.L
3TSL.L
3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX (3TSL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3AMD.L | 3TSL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.05 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.13 | -0.52 | +18.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.23 | -0.96 | +34.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, roughly equal to the maximum 3TSL.L drawdown of -99.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMD.L and 3TSL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3AMD.L | 3TSL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.50% | -99.59% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.34% | -71.97% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.93% | -94.73% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.50% | -99.59% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.97% | -91.91% | +14.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.29% | -75.08% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.73% | 38.02% | +3.71% |
Volatility
3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 58.64% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Tesla ETP Securities GBX (3TSL.L) at 34.98%. This indicates that 3AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3TSL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3AMD.L | 3TSL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 58.64% | 34.98% | +23.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 142.38% | 86.01% | +56.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 193.33% | 134.35% | +58.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.13% | 7,987.61% | -7,827.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.34% | 7,777.58% | -7,618.24% |
3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3AMD.L and 3TSL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3AMD.L vs. 3TSL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3AMD.L nor 3TSL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3AMD.L and 3TSL.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3AMD.L and 3TSL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
3AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index, while 3TSL.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSLA Index.
Find the right allocation for 3AMD.L and 3TSL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer