PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AMD.L achieves a 658.07% return, which is significantly higher than 3NVD.L's 20.65% return.


3AMD.L

1D
11.54%
1M
184.55%
YTD
658.07%
6M
604.25%
1Y
2,384.13%
3Y*
51.93%
5Y*
10Y*

3NVD.L

1D
-12.40%
1M
23.64%
YTD
20.65%
6M
30.05%
1Y
114.77%
3Y*
132.01%
5Y*
82.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3AMD.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP
658.07%53.77%-76.38%448.82%-97.41%265.31%
3NVD.L
Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP
20.65%-12.14%735.89%1,729.24%-96.41%159.59%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AMD.L and 3NVD.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.66

The correlation between 3AMD.L and 3NVD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AMD.L
3AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

3NVD.L
3NVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
3NVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3NVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
3NVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
3NVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
3NVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AMD.L3NVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+11.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.23

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

30.82

1.95

+28.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.95

3.92

+53.03

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 12.48, which is higher than the 3NVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AMD.L and 3NVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AMD.L3NVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48

1.13

+11.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.72

-0.67

Drawdowns

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, roughly equal to the maximum 3NVD.L drawdown of -98.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMD.L and 3NVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AMD.L3NVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.50%

-98.48%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.34%

-58.47%

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.93%

-89.34%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.32%

-38.33%

-32.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.94%

-53.01%

-31.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.40%

29.19%

+12.21%

Volatility

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 68.82% compared to Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L) at 36.52%. This indicates that 3AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3NVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AMD.L3NVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

68.82%

36.52%

+32.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

134.33%

69.21%

+65.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

188.76%

101.34%

+87.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

158.33%

146.09%

+12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

158.33%

146.56%

+11.77%

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AMD.L and 3NVD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AMD.L vs. 3NVD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AMD.L nor 3NVD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AMD.L and 3NVD.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AMD.L and 3NVD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index, while 3NVD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X NVDA Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AMD.L and 3NVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer