PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3NVD.L
Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP
-27.09%-12.14%735.89%1,729.24%-96.41%536.91%-10.66%
3GOO.L
Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP
-23.13%146.08%80.34%154.87%-85.80%293.65%12.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3NVD.L achieves a -27.09% return, which is significantly lower than 3GOO.L's -23.13% return.


3NVD.L

1D
9.32%
1M
-11.31%
YTD
-27.09%
6M
-35.18%
1Y
112.91%
3Y*
165.45%
5Y*
89.89%
10Y*

3GOO.L

1D
13.71%
1M
-12.07%
YTD
-23.13%
6M
52.28%
1Y
299.77%
3Y*
86.81%
5Y*
24.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3NVD.L and 3GOO.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3NVD.L
3NVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3NVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3NVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
3NVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
3NVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
3NVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

3GOO.L
3GOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
3GOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3NVD.L3GOO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

3.42

-2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

3.44

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

6.02

-4.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.92

20.38

-16.46

3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3NVD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the 3GOO.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3NVD.L and 3GOO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3NVD.L3GOO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

3.42

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.29

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.41

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between 3NVD.L and 3GOO.L is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3NVD.L nor 3GOO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3NVD.L drawdown since its inception was -98.48%, which is greater than 3GOO.L's maximum drawdown of -88.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3NVD.L and 3GOO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


3NVD.L3GOO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.48%

-88.06%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.47%

-50.61%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.48%

-88.06%

-10.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.73%

-39.39%

-23.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.33%

-45.51%

-7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.09%

14.96%

+12.13%

Volatility

3NVD.L vs. 3GOO.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Alphabet ETC GBP (3GOO.L) have volatilities of 23.74% and 24.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


3NVD.L3GOO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.74%

24.24%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.56%

56.77%

+18.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.45%

87.43%

+27.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

147.09%

89.67%

+57.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

147.49%

89.83%

+57.66%