PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AMD.L achieves a 658.07% return, which is significantly higher than 2AMD.L's 345.45% return.


3AMD.L

1D
11.54%
1M
184.55%
YTD
658.07%
6M
604.25%
1Y
2,384.13%
3Y*
51.93%
5Y*
10Y*

2AMD.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
98.27%
YTD
345.45%
6M
330.90%
1Y
1,086.85%
3Y*
74.75%
5Y*
45.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3AMD.L
Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP
658.07%53.77%-76.38%448.82%-97.41%265.31%
2AMD.L
Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP
345.45%82.40%-49.88%285.12%-86.24%166.80%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AMD.L and 2AMD.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.97

The correlation between 3AMD.L and 2AMD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AMD.L
3AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

2AMD.L
2AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AMD.L2AMD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.63

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

30.82

21.03

+9.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.95

41.31

+15.64

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 12.48, which is higher than the 2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 9.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AMD.L and 2AMD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AMD.L2AMD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48

9.26

+3.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.48

-0.43

Drawdowns

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AMD.L drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, which is greater than 2AMD.L's maximum drawdown of -91.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AMD.L and 2AMD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AMD.L2AMD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.50%

-91.38%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.34%

-55.04%

-21.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.93%

-89.49%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.32%

-4.46%

-66.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.94%

-54.54%

-30.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.40%

28.08%

+13.32%

Volatility

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x AMD ETC GBP (3AMD.L) has a higher volatility of 68.82% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) at 46.51%. This indicates that 3AMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2AMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AMD.L2AMD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

68.82%

46.51%

+22.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

134.33%

87.42%

+46.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

188.76%

124.99%

+63.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

158.33%

104.20%

+54.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

158.33%

102.07%

+56.26%

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AMD.L and 2AMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AMD.L vs. 2AMD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AMD.L nor 2AMD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, 3AMD.L and 2AMD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AMD.L and 2AMD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x AMD Index, while 2AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X AMD Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AMD.L and 2AMD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer