3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

3ABN.L (Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP) and 3NVD.L (Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3ABN.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index while 3NVD.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X NVDA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 3ABN.L returned 41.02%/yr vs 61.74%/yr for 3NVD.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3ABN.L achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly higher than 3NVD.L's -15.31% return.

3ABN.L

• 1D: 4.96%
• 1M: 24.01%
• YTD: -3.36%
• 6M: -2.80%
• 1Y: -10.71%
• 3Y*: 267.95%
• 5Y*: 41.02%
• 10Y*: —

3NVD.L

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -24.72%
• YTD: -15.31%
• 6M: -15.83%
• 1Y: 19.99%
• 3Y*: 103.88%
• 5Y*: 61.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
3ABN.L Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP	-3.36%	12,759.06%	-45.96%	65.33%	-95.15%	-22.60%
3NVD.L Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP	-15.31%	-12.14%	735.90%	1,729.07%	-96.41%	238.16%

Correlation

The correlation between 3ABN.L and 3NVD.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between 3ABN.L and 3NVD.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	3ABN.L	3NVD.L
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3ABN.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

3NVD.L

3NVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
3NVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
3NVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
3NVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
3NVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
3NVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	3ABN.L	3NVD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	0.19	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	1.02	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.12	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	0.34	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	0.65	-0.93

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3ABN.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the 3NVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3ABN.L and 3NVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3ABN.L drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, roughly equal to the maximum 3NVD.L drawdown of -98.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ABN.L and 3NVD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	3ABN.L	3NVD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.81%	-98.48%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.74%	-58.47%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.81%	-89.34%	-10.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.81%	-98.48%	-1.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.69%	-56.71%	-42.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.65%	-51.10%	-34.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.53%	30.73%	+7.80%

Volatility

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) and Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L) have volatilities of 28.58% and 29.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3ABN.L	3NVD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.58%	29.13%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	71.79%	70.09%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.53%	102.36%	-13.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2,260,368.85%	145.55%	+2,260,223.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2,251,438.09%	140.81%	+2,251,297.28%

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3ABN.L and 3NVD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3ABN.L vs. 3NVD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3ABN.L nor 3NVD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3ABN.L and 3NVD.L in my portfolio?

3ABN.L and 3NVD.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3ABN.L or 3NVD.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3ABN.L or 3NVD.L?

3ABN.L and 3NVD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

What is the main difference between 3ABN.L and 3NVD.L?

3ABN.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index, while 3NVD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X NVDA Index.