PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3ABE.L is traded in EUR, while 3KOR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3KOR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3ABE.L achieves a -16.89% return, which is significantly lower than 3KOR.L's 439.02% return.


3ABE.L

1D
7.81%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-16.89%
6M
19.33%
1Y
-32.35%
3Y*
-27.16%
5Y*
10Y*

3KOR.L

1D
-13.99%
1M
40.54%
YTD
439.02%
6M
565.80%
1Y
1,538.09%
3Y*
97.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
3ABE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR
-16.89%-45.87%-43.38%113.95%-82.47%
3KOR.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities
439.02%302.49%-59.85%11.58%-56.35%

Correlation

The correlation between 3ABE.L and 3KOR.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.23

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
3ABE.L
3KOR.L

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
5.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.8%

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

9.5%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Industrials

-

20.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

52.3%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3ABE.L
100.0%
3KOR.L
5.8%

Basic Materials

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
2.0%

Communication Services

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
1.8%

Energy

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
1.4%

Financial Services

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
9.5%

Healthcare

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
3.5%

Industrials

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
20.4%

Real Estate

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L

-

Technology

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
52.3%

Utilities

3ABE.L

-

3KOR.L
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3ABE.L
3ABE.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
3ABE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3ABE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

3KOR.L
3KOR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
3KOR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3ABE.L3KOR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.71

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

25.69

-26.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

78.89

-79.73

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3ABE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the 3KOR.L Sharpe Ratio of 12.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3ABE.L and 3KOR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3ABE.L3KOR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

12.52

-12.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.51

-0.96

Drawdowns

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3ABE.L drawdown since its inception was -99.31%, which is greater than 3KOR.L's maximum drawdown of -85.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3ABE.L and 3KOR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3ABE.L3KOR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.31%

-85.84%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.55%

-59.16%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.71%

-76.46%

-13.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.02%

-16.00%

-83.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.06%

-53.39%

-31.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.29%

19.31%

+18.98%

Volatility

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETC EUR (3ABE.L) is 26.11%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a volatility of 53.80%. This indicates that 3ABE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3KOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3ABE.L3KOR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.11%

53.80%

-27.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.60%

97.65%

-28.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.23%

121.56%

-35.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

156.33%

84.97%

+71.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

156.33%

84.97%

+71.36%

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3ABE.L and 3KOR.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3ABE.L vs. 3KOR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3ABE.L nor 3KOR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3ABE.L and 3KOR.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3ABE.L and 3KOR.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3ABE.L and 3KOR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer