PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3AAP.L is traded in GBp, while SMH3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AAP.L achieves a 29.86% return, which is significantly lower than SMH3.L's 305.05% return.


3AAP.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
34.96%
YTD
29.86%
6M
16.84%
1Y
162.50%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
24.14%
10Y*

SMH3.L

1D
-6.35%
1M
62.47%
YTD
305.05%
6M
295.43%
1Y
890.07%
3Y*
154.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
29.86%-28.23%70.02%151.70%-73.70%2.60%
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
305.05%62.22%69.91%243.35%-83.36%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AAP.L and SMH3.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021

0.43

The correlation between 3AAP.L and SMH3.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AAP.LSMH3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.61

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

23.48

-19.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

75.37

-68.22

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio of 9.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AAP.L and SMH3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AAP.LSMH3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

9.62

-7.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.53

-0.11

Drawdowns

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AAP.L drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum SMH3.L drawdown of -87.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AAP.L and SMH3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AAP.LSMH3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.66%

-87.38%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.36%

-37.52%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.42%

-84.61%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.32%

-6.35%

-2.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.84%

-47.65%

+12.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.63%

11.71%

+10.92%

Volatility

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) is 15.65%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a volatility of 38.87%. This indicates that 3AAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AAP.LSMH3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.65%

38.87%

-23.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.09%

70.05%

-20.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.77%

91.61%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.95%

99.01%

-12.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.95%

99.01%

-10.06%

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AAP.L and SMH3.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AAP.L vs. SMH3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AAP.L nor SMH3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AAP.L and SMH3.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AAP.L and SMH3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AAP.L and SMH3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer