PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AAP.L vs. COII.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AAP.L vs. COII.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AAP.L achieves a 29.86% return, which is significantly higher than COII.L's -44.56% return.


3AAP.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
34.96%
YTD
29.86%
6M
16.84%
1Y
162.50%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
24.14%
10Y*

COII.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-12.47%
YTD
-44.56%
6M
-52.15%
1Y
-65.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AAP.L vs. COII.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
29.86%-28.23%38.71%
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
-44.56%-47.27%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AAP.L and COII.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024

0.19

The correlation between 3AAP.L and COII.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AAP.L vs. COII.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

COII.L
COII.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COII.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COII.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COII.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COII.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COII.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AAP.L vs. COII.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AAP.LCOII.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.77

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

-0.88

+4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

-1.34

+8.49

3AAP.L vs. COII.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the COII.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AAP.L and COII.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AAP.LCOII.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

-1.09

+2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.81

+1.22

Drawdowns

3AAP.L vs. COII.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AAP.L drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, roughly equal to the maximum COII.L drawdown of -76.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AAP.L and COII.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AAP.LCOII.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.66%

-76.00%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.36%

-74.77%

+30.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.32%

-75.01%

+65.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.84%

-34.14%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.63%

49.16%

-26.53%

Volatility

3AAP.L vs. COII.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) have volatilities of 15.65% and 16.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AAP.LCOII.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.65%

16.24%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.09%

41.47%

+7.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.77%

60.26%

+38.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.95%

58.71%

+28.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.95%

58.71%

+30.24%

3AAP.L vs. COII.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3AAP.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COII.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

3AAP.L vs. COII.L - Dividend Comparison

3AAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.73%.


PositionTTM20252024
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%
COII.L
IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP
105.73%191.72%18.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


3AAP.L and COII.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COII.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COII.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3AAP.L.

3AAP.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COII.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 3AAP.L and 0.55% for COII.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AAP.L and COII.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer