PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AAP.L achieves a 29.86% return, which is significantly higher than 3PLT.L's -69.38% return.


3AAP.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
34.96%
YTD
29.86%
6M
16.84%
1Y
162.50%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
24.14%
10Y*

3PLT.L

1D
-6.07%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-69.38%
6M
-69.66%
1Y
-50.24%
3Y*
136.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
29.86%-28.23%70.02%151.70%-73.70%148.82%
3PLT.L
Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities
-69.38%154.21%2,527.55%363.59%-99.42%-70.37%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AAP.L and 3PLT.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between 3AAP.L and 3PLT.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

3PLT.L
3PLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3PLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3AAP.L3PLT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.05

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

-0.59

+4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

-0.95

+8.10

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the 3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AAP.L and 3PLT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3AAP.L3PLT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

-0.33

+1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.16

+0.57

Drawdowns

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AAP.L drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum 3PLT.L drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AAP.L and 3PLT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3AAP.L3PLT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.66%

-99.89%

+24.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.36%

-85.49%

+41.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.42%

-86.37%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.32%

-87.97%

+78.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.84%

-84.65%

+49.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.63%

53.01%

-30.38%

Volatility

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) is 15.65%, while Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) has a volatility of 50.91%. This indicates that 3AAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3PLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3AAP.L3PLT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.65%

50.91%

-35.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.09%

109.43%

-60.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.77%

150.29%

-51.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.95%

193.66%

-106.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.95%

193.66%

-104.71%

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AAP.L and 3PLT.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3AAP.L vs. 3PLT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AAP.L nor 3PLT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3AAP.L and 3PLT.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AAP.L and 3PLT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3AAP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index, while 3PLT.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x PLTR Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AAP.L and 3PLT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer