36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE
36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) and XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds - 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion while XCS6.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 36BZ.DE returned 5.98%/yr vs 4.37%/yr for XCS6.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 36BZ.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XCS6.DE.
Performance
36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 36BZ.DE achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly higher than XCS6.DE's -7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, 36BZ.DE has outperformed XCS6.DE with an annualized return of 5.98%, while XCS6.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.37% annualized return.
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
XCS6.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -9.67%
- 1Y
- 2.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | -21.26% | 13.41% | 28.50% | 37.21% | -23.49% | 14.90% |
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -7.24% | 16.38% | 27.05% | -15.14% | -15.45% | -17.27% | 15.11% | 26.93% | -16.14% | 35.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between 36BZ.DE and XCS6.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2015 | 0.72 |
The correlation between 36BZ.DE and XCS6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
36BZ.DE
XCS6.DE
36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 36BZ.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.04 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.10 | 0.13 | +4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.77 | 0.27 | +13.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 36BZ.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.12 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.17 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.17 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.16 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, smaller than the maximum XCS6.DE drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BZ.DE and XCS6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 36BZ.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.30% | -56.31% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -17.28% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.01% | -24.77% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.94% | -49.94% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.38% | -56.31% | +12.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | -33.60% | +23.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.19% | -21.19% | -9.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 8.27% | -5.83% |
Volatility
36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) is 5.55%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that 36BZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 36BZ.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 7.17% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 13.14% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 18.53% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 27.67% | -6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 25.33% | -3.23% |
36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
36BZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS6.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
36BZ.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 36BZ.DE nor XCS6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
36BZ.DE and XCS6.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 36BZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
36BZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion, while XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 36BZ.DE and 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
Find the right allocation for 36BZ.DE and XCS6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer