36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE
36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion while FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 36BZ.DE returned -0.23%/yr vs -3.95%/yr for FLXC.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 36BZ.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 36BZ.DE achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | -21.26% | 13.41% | 28.50% | 14.58% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 16.83% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between 36BZ.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between 36BZ.DE and FLXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
36BZ.DE
FLXC.DE
36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 36BZ.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.06 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.10 | 0.31 | +4.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.77 | 0.64 | +13.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 36BZ.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.27 | +1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.15 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.09 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXC.DE drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BZ.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 36BZ.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.30% | -55.61% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -15.19% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.01% | -24.70% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.94% | -49.07% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.22% | -30.89% | +20.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.19% | -27.95% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 7.38% | -4.94% |
Volatility
36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) is 5.55%, while Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that 36BZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 36BZ.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 6.78% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 12.35% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 17.78% | -1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 26.71% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 26.20% | -4.10% |
36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
36BZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
36BZ.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 36BZ.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
36BZ.DE and FLXC.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 36BZ.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for 36BZ.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer