PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36BA.DE vs. RNRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36BA.DE vs. RNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36BA.DE) and Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

36BA.DE is traded in EUR, while RNRG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RNRG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 36BA.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than RNRG's 17.75% return.


36BA.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-0.48%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*

RNRG

1D
-1.19%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
17.75%
6M
15.91%
1Y
37.74%
3Y*
1.26%
5Y*
-2.00%
10Y*
4.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36BA.DE vs. RNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
36BA.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
-0.71%5.40%0.20%5.45%-17.07%-2.51%7.23%
RNRG
Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
17.75%14.23%-16.85%-15.43%-10.05%-6.26%29.45%

Correlation

The correlation between 36BA.DE and RNRG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020

0.21

The correlation between 36BA.DE and RNRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36BA.DE vs. RNRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36BA.DE
36BA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
36BA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36BA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
36BA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
36BA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
36BA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RNRG
RNRG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36BA.DE vs. RNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36BA.DE) and Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


36BA.DERNRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.45

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

7.29

-6.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

21.61

-19.18

36BA.DE vs. RNRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36BA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the RNRG Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36BA.DE and RNRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


36BA.DERNRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.62

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

-0.11

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.04

-0.14

Drawdowns

36BA.DE vs. RNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36BA.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.68%, smaller than the maximum RNRG drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BA.DE and RNRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36BA.DERNRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.68%

-53.86%

+30.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-5.20%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.31%

-35.42%

+29.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-52.76%

+29.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.87%

-27.25%

+16.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-22.59%

+11.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.75%

-0.61%

Volatility

36BA.DE vs. RNRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36BA.DE) is 1.83%, while Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that 36BA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36BA.DERNRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

4.86%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.63%

10.90%

-7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.67%

14.50%

-9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.09%

18.24%

-11.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.86%

18.85%

-11.99%

36BA.DE vs. RNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

36BA.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than RNRG's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

36BA.DE vs. RNRG - Dividend Comparison

36BA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than RNRG's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
36BA.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
4.95%4.73%4.75%4.15%2.94%1.76%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNRG
Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF
1.29%1.50%1.48%1.44%1.15%1.10%3.16%2.97%5.22%4.14%5.02%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


36BA.DE and RNRG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 36BA.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

36BA.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RNRG.

36BA.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RNRG is Alternative Energy Equities. 36BA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI Index (EUR Hedged), while RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for 36BA.DE and 0.65% for RNRG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36BA.DE and RNRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer