PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 36B4.DE achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than FRCJ.DE's 16.62% return.


36B4.DE

1D
-1.25%
1M
5.00%
6M
5.52%
YTD
9.48%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*

FRCJ.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
3.48%
6M
11.09%
YTD
16.62%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
9.48%6.64%9.02%9.56%-13.77%9.87%6.38%16.82%
FRCJ.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
16.62%13.40%13.07%10.16%-14.97%4.12%9.94%16.59%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B4.DE and FRCJ.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.93

The correlation between 36B4.DE and FRCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B4.DE
36B4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FRCJ.DE
FRCJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


36B4.DEFRCJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.40

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

11.61

-5.71

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B4.DE and FRCJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B4.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FRCJ.DE drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B4.DE and FRCJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36B4.DEFRCJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.98%

-26.67%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-10.45%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-16.98%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-22.04%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-2.05%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-7.17%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

3.07%

+0.68%

Volatility

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) is 5.12%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that 36B4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36B4.DEFRCJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

6.28%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

15.25%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

19.00%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

16.57%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

16.49%

+0.77%

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36B4.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FRCJ.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

36B4.DE vs. FRCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than FRCJ.DE's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.47%1.46%1.38%1.81%2.45%1.54%1.60%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRCJ.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
0.98%1.78%1.62%1.59%1.82%1.31%1.40%1.44%1.61%1.43%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, 36B4.DE and FRCJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FRCJ.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRCJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 36B4.DE.

36B4.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while FRCJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for 36B4.DE and 0.19% for FRCJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36B4.DE and FRCJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer