PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SPFD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 36B1.DE achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than SPFD.DE's -1.67% return.


36B1.DE

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.73%
YTD
5.59%
6M
5.87%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*

SPFD.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
-1.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
5.59%0.52%11.39%6.09%-13.65%5.10%-3.83%0.82%
SPFD.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-1.67%12.44%-4.38%6.62%-12.76%-9.84%1.86%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B1.DE and SPFD.DE is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.04

The correlation between 36B1.DE and SPFD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B1.DE
36B1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SPFD.DE
SPFD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SPFD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SPFD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


36B1.DESPFD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.04

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

0.22

+4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

0.61

+11.98

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the SPFD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B1.DE and SPFD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B1.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum SPFD.DE drawdown of -28.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B1.DE and SPFD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36B1.DESPFD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-28.89%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-6.69%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.32%

-9.26%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.23%

-25.58%

+9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-11.63%

+11.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-13.42%

+4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

2.46%

-1.47%

Volatility

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) is 1.67%, while State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SPFD.DE) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that 36B1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPFD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36B1.DESPFD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

2.50%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

6.71%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.15%

7.44%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.53%

7.99%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.18%

8.41%

+1.77%

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36B1.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SPFD.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

36B1.DE vs. SPFD.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, while SPFD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
5.61%5.96%5.31%5.52%5.19%3.36%3.81%4.65%0.44%
SPFD.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


36B1.DE and SPFD.DE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 36B1.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

36B1.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SPFD.DE.

36B1.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified, while SPFD.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for 36B1.DE and 0.60% for SPFD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36B1.DE and SPFD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer