SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPFD.DE (State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and EMA5.DE (L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SPFD.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond Index (EUR Hedged) while EMA5.DE tracks the J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPFD.DE returned -1.83%/yr vs 3.38%/yr for EMA5.DE. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. SPFD.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EMA5.DE.

Performance

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SPFD.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPFD.DE achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than EMA5.DE's 2.33% return.

SPFD.DE

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: -1.76%
• 6M: -1.05%
• 1Y: 2.41%
• 3Y*: 2.99%
• 5Y*: -1.83%
• 10Y*: —

EMA5.DE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 5.12%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPFD.DE State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	-1.76%	12.45%	-4.39%	6.63%	-12.77%	-9.84%	1.05%
EMA5.DE L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	2.33%	-2.57%	14.01%	3.79%	-5.07%	7.86%	-1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPFD.DE and EMA5.DE is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020	-0.35

Return for Risk

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPFD.DE

SPFD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 14
SPFD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
SPFD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SPFD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SPFD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
SPFD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

EMA5.DE

EMA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 24
EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
EMA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
EMA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
EMA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EMA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SPFD.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPFD.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	0.72	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	1.07	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.13	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	1.38	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	3.47	-2.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPFD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPFD.DE and EMA5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPFD.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	0.72	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	0.47	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	0.47	-0.60

Drawdowns

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPFD.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.91%, which is greater than EMA5.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFD.DE and EMA5.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPFD.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.91%	-10.01%	-18.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-3.06%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.24%	-10.01%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.77%	-10.01%	-16.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.71%	-3.17%	-8.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.46%	-3.55%	-9.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.22%	+1.00%

Volatility

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SPFD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) at 2.25%. This indicates that SPFD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPFD.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	2.25%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.38%	4.23%	+2.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.27%	5.86%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.94%	7.07%	+0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.88%	6.94%	+1.94%

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPFD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EMA5.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPFD.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Dividend Comparison

SPFD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMA5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMA5.DE L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	4.59%	5.61%	5.39%	4.22%	2.89%	1.01%
SPFD.DE State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPFD.DE and EMA5.DE in my portfolio?

SPFD.DE and EMA5.DE have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPFD.DE or EMA5.DE?

On fees, EMA5.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPFD.DE or EMA5.DE?

EMA5.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SPFD.DE.

What is the main difference between SPFD.DE and EMA5.DE?

SPFD.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while EMA5.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPFD.DE and 0.25% for EMA5.DE.