PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 36B1.DE achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than IS02.DE's 2.97% return.


36B1.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
1.40%
YTD
2.43%
6M
1.88%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*

IS02.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
1.39%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.43%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
2.43%-0.10%10.86%5.55%-13.71%6.46%-1.07%
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.97%1.10%11.83%6.71%-13.12%5.72%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B1.DE and IS02.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020

0.96

The correlation between 36B1.DE and IS02.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B1.DE
36B1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IS02.DE
IS02.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS02.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


36B1.DEIS02.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.11

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

8.98

-2.26

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the IS02.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B1.DE and IS02.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


36B1.DEIS02.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.57

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.33

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.27

-0.05

Drawdowns

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B1.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.46%, which is greater than IS02.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B1.DE and IS02.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36B1.DEIS02.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.46%

-16.21%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-3.00%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-12.85%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-16.21%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

0.00%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-5.92%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

1.04%

+0.12%

Volatility

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) have volatilities of 1.21% and 1.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36B1.DEIS02.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.19%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

3.97%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87%

5.94%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.41%

8.53%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.55%

8.34%

+1.21%

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 36B1.DE and IS02.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

36B1.DE vs. IS02.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, while IS02.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
4.93%5.22%4.96%5.09%5.00%4.57%3.40%4.19%
IS02.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, 36B1.DE and IS02.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

36B1.DE and IS02.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

36B1.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified, while IS02.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36B1.DE and IS02.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer