PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3191.HK vs. VAPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3191.HK is traded in HKD, while VAPX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAPX.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3191.HK achieves a 59.23% return, which is significantly higher than VAPX.L's 49.46% return.


3191.HK

1D
1.28%
1M
16.48%
YTD
59.23%
6M
64.80%
1Y
127.38%
3Y*
31.05%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*

VAPX.L

1D
-3.07%
1M
5.81%
YTD
49.46%
6M
55.25%
1Y
80.36%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
3191.HK
Global X China Semiconductor ETF
59.23%41.08%11.15%-6.56%-39.25%19.31%-1.68%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
49.46%40.94%-5.84%9.09%-12.19%0.92%25.48%

Correlation

The correlation between 3191.HK and VAPX.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2020

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3191.HK
3191.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
3191.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3191.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
3191.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
3191.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
3191.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3191.HKVAPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.64

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.33

5.42

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.10

21.38

-5.28

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3191.HK Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is comparable to the VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3191.HK and VAPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3191.HKVAPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48

3.64

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.62

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.45

-0.21

Drawdowns

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3191.HK drawdown since its inception was -63.76%, which is greater than VAPX.L's maximum drawdown of -39.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3191.HK and VAPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3191.HKVAPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.76%

-39.49%

-24.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-14.98%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.94%

-20.53%

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.76%

-31.57%

-32.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-3.83%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.82%

-10.21%

-23.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.33%

3.80%

+4.53%

Volatility

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X China Semiconductor ETF (3191.HK) has a higher volatility of 16.63% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) at 10.98%. This indicates that 3191.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3191.HKVAPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.63%

10.98%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.09%

19.68%

+9.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.02%

22.34%

+16.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.12%

18.90%

+21.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.46%

19.14%

+20.32%

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

3191.HK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VAPX.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

3191.HK vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison

3191.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
3191.HK
Global X China Semiconductor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.54%2.36%3.20%3.30%4.12%2.99%1.81%3.28%3.55%3.07%2.71%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


3191.HK and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAPX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAPX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for 3191.HK.

3191.HK is categorized as China Equities, while VAPX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. 3191.HK tracks Factset China Semiconductor Index, while VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for 3191.HK and 0.15% for VAPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3191.HK and VAPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer