3070.HK vs. SPY

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

3070.HK (Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 3070.HK is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Hong Kong Dividend Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 3070.HK returned 12.03%/yr vs 15.85%/yr for SPY. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 3070.HK charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.

Performance

3070.HK vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF (3070.HK) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

3070.HK is traded in HKD, while SPY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3070.HK achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, 3070.HK has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 12.03%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.85% annualized return.

3070.HK

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: -9.40%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 6.69%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: 13.14%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

SPY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.03%
• YTD: 8.87%
• 6M: 7.63%
• 1Y: 21.94%
• 3Y*: 20.87%
• 5Y*: 13.18%
• 10Y*: 15.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3070.HK vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
3070.HK Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF	0.66%	25.91%	36.16%	12.21%	3.61%	4.52%	-12.13%	9.46%	-5.99%	54.37%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	9.05%	17.95%	24.24%	26.16%	-18.04%	29.43%	17.80%	30.53%	-4.36%	22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between 3070.HK and SPY is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2012	0.12

The correlation between 3070.HK and SPY shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

3070.HK vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3070.HK

3070.HK Risk / Return Rank: 15
3070.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
3070.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
3070.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 14
3070.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
3070.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 18

SPY

SPY Risk / Return Rank: 63
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3070.HK vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF (3070.HK) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	3070.HK	SPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	1.77	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	2.43	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.32	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	2.57	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.80	11.37	-9.58

3070.HK vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3070.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3070.HK and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

3070.HK vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3070.HK drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3070.HK and SPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	3070.HK	SPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.58%	-55.21%	+21.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.45%	-8.58%	-4.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	-18.83%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.26%	-23.99%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.58%	-33.85%	+0.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.45%	-3.20%	-10.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-7.71%	-2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.77%	1.93%	+1.84%

Volatility

3070.HK vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF (3070.HK) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 4.78% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	3070.HK	SPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	4.78%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.89%	9.79%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.87%	12.42%	+2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	17.14%	+1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.99%	17.92%	+1.07%

3070.HK vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

3070.HK has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

3070.HK vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

3070.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than SPY's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
3070.HK Ping An of China CSI HK Dividend ETF	6.07%	4.79%	3.93%	6.93%	8.04%	6.05%	4.20%	4.33%	4.86%	2.45%	6.13%	3.33%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	1.02%	1.07%	1.21%	1.40%	1.65%	1.20%	1.52%	1.75%	2.04%	1.80%	2.03%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 3070.HK and SPY in my portfolio?

3070.HK and SPY have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 3070.HK or SPY?

On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 3070.HK or SPY?

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for 3070.HK.

What is the main difference between 3070.HK and SPY?

3070.HK is categorized as China Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. 3070.HK tracks CSI Hong Kong Dividend Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Ping An of China Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for 3070.HK and 0.09% for SPY.