2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L
2NFL.L (Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP) and TSLI.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - 2NFL.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Leveraged 2x NFLX Index, while TSLI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 2NFL.L is passively managed, while TSLI.L is actively managed. Over the past year, 2NFL.L returned -63.34% vs 48.33% for TSLI.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2NFL.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSLI.L.
Performance
2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
2NFL.L is traded in GBp, while TSLI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2NFL.L achieves a -29.19% return, which is significantly lower than TSLI.L's -9.32% return.
2NFL.L
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -12.87%
- YTD
- -29.19%
- 6M
- -41.74%
- 1Y
- -63.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.31%
- 5Y*
- -6.44%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLI.L
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- -9.32%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- 1Y
- 48.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
2NFL.L Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP | -29.19% | -20.02% | 90.67% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | -9.32% | 30.51% | 31.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2NFL.L and TSLI.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.13 |
The correlation between 2NFL.L and TSLI.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L — Risk / Return Rank
2NFL.L
TSLI.L
2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2NFL.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.22 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.95 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 4.87 | -6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2NFL.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 1.29 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.65 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2NFL.L drawdown since its inception was -95.91%, which is greater than TSLI.L's maximum drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2NFL.L and TSLI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2NFL.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.91% | -43.88% | -52.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.00% | -24.61% | -46.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.58% | -15.06% | -52.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.90% | -13.75% | -35.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.23% | 9.87% | +34.36% |
Volatility
2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) has a higher volatility of 15.28% compared to IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) at 12.13%. This indicates that 2NFL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2NFL.L | TSLI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.28% | 12.13% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.18% | 25.23% | +26.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.53% | 37.48% | +27.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.01% | 43.01% | +48.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.95% | 43.01% | +42.94% |
2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
2NFL.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
2NFL.L vs. TSLI.L - Dividend Comparison
2NFL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
2NFL.L Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLI.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP | 74.25% | 73.68% | 19.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
2NFL.L and TSLI.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2NFL.L.
2NFL.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLI.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 2NFL.L and 0.55% for TSLI.L.
Find the right allocation for 2NFL.L and TSLI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer