2FB.L vs. COII.L
2FB.L (Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP) and COII.L (IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - 2FB.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index, while COII.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. 2FB.L is passively managed, while COII.L is actively managed. Over the past year, 2FB.L returned -28.39% vs -65.82% for COII.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2FB.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for COII.L.
Performance
2FB.L vs. COII.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2FB.L achieves a -16.41% return, which is significantly higher than COII.L's -44.56% return.
2FB.L
- 1D
- 7.11%
- 1M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- -16.41%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- -28.39%
- 3Y*
- 38.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
COII.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- YTD
- -44.56%
- 6M
- -52.15%
- 1Y
- -65.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2FB.L vs. COII.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -16.41% | -8.57% | 13.78% |
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP | -44.56% | -47.27% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2FB.L and COII.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2FB.L vs. COII.L — Risk / Return Rank
2FB.L
COII.L
2FB.L vs. COII.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2FB.L | COII.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.77 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | -0.88 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -1.34 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2FB.L | COII.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | -1.09 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.81 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
2FB.L vs. COII.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2FB.L drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, which is greater than COII.L's maximum drawdown of -76.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2FB.L and COII.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2FB.L | COII.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.13% | -76.00% | -20.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.32% | -74.77% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.57% | -75.01% | +25.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.73% | -34.14% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.69% | 49.16% | -16.47% |
Volatility
2FB.L vs. COII.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) is 15.00%, while IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP (COII.L) has a volatility of 16.24%. This indicates that 2FB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COII.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2FB.L | COII.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.00% | 16.24% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.06% | 41.47% | +9.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.69% | 60.26% | +6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.82% | 58.71% | +25.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.67% | 58.71% | +19.96% |
2FB.L vs. COII.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
2FB.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COII.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
2FB.L vs. COII.L - Dividend Comparison
2FB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COII.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COII.L IncomeShares Coinbase (COIN) Options ETP GBP | 105.73% | 191.72% | 18.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
2FB.L and COII.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COII.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COII.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2FB.L.
2FB.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COII.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 2FB.L and 0.55% for COII.L.
Find the right allocation for 2FB.L and COII.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer