2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F
2B7S.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) and VUDP.F (Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing) are both Government Bonds funds - 2B7S.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year (EUR Hedged) Index while VUDP.F tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B7S.DE achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than VUDP.F's -1.75% return.
2B7S.DE
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 1.31%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.00%
- 10Y*
- —
VUDP.F
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
2B7S.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -0.08% | 0.24% |
VUDP.F Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing | -1.75% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B7S.DE and VUDP.F is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F — Risk / Return Rank
2B7S.DE
VUDP.F
2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B7S.DE | VUDP.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B7S.DE | VUDP.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | -0.43 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B7S.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.76%, which is greater than VUDP.F's maximum drawdown of -2.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7S.DE and VUDP.F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B7S.DE | VUDP.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -2.16% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.97% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -0.82% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | — | — |
Volatility
2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B7S.DE | VUDP.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29% | 2.34% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.99% | 2.34% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.96% | 2.34% | -0.38% |
2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 2B7S.DE and VUDP.F have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
2B7S.DE vs. VUDP.F - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B7S.DE nor VUDP.F has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B7S.DE and VUDP.F have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B7S.DE and VUDP.F have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
2B7S.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year (EUR Hedged) Index, while VUDP.F tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
Find the right allocation for 2B7S.DE and VUDP.F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer