PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7K.DE achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly lower than UIMP.DE's 15.44% return.


2B7K.DE

1D
-0.29%
1M
3.61%
YTD
12.95%
6M
13.14%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*

UIMP.DE

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.45%
YTD
15.44%
6M
15.78%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
14.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
12.95%2.87%17.54%20.84%-16.92%36.73%9.54%20.04%
UIMP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
15.44%-1.33%25.94%27.84%-21.40%43.23%10.69%18.24%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7K.DE and UIMP.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.95

The correlation between 2B7K.DE and UIMP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7K.DE
2B7K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

UIMP.DE
UIMP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
UIMP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIMP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2B7K.DEUIMP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.69

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.97

8.69

+2.28

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the UIMP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7K.DE and UIMP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7K.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum UIMP.DE drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7K.DE and UIMP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7K.DEUIMP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-33.37%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-9.42%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.33%

-24.74%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-24.74%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.57%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-8.06%

+2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.93%

-0.88%

Volatility

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) is 3.41%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UIMP.DE) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that 2B7K.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIMP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7K.DEUIMP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

4.03%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

10.01%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

13.63%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

16.59%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.85%

-0.68%

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7K.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UIMP.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7K.DE vs. UIMP.DE - Dividend Comparison

2B7K.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UIMP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIMP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.41%0.82%0.70%0.75%0.92%0.62%0.90%0.97%1.03%1.25%1.26%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, 2B7K.DE and UIMP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 2B7K.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7K.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for UIMP.DE.

2B7K.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while UIMP.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for 2B7K.DE and 0.22% for UIMP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7K.DE and UIMP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer