PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 2B7K.DE having a 10.83% return and EDMU.DE slightly lower at 10.40%.


2B7K.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
3.92%
YTD
10.83%
6M
11.24%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*

EDMU.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.59%
YTD
10.40%
6M
9.74%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
2B7K.DE
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
10.83%2.85%17.54%20.90%-16.94%36.69%9.65%13.77%
EDMU.DE
iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.40%2.64%31.12%22.05%-17.35%38.97%10.90%13.90%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7K.DE and EDMU.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.93

The correlation between 2B7K.DE and EDMU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7K.DE
2B7K.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7K.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EDMU.DE
EDMU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7K.DEEDMU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.85

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

9.88

-1.24

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7K.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7K.DE and EDMU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7K.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.95

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.82

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.83

-0.04

Drawdowns

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7K.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.65%, smaller than the maximum EDMU.DE drawdown of -33.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7K.DE and EDMU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7K.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.65%

-33.43%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-8.15%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.29%

-24.12%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

-24.12%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-5.36%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.36%

-0.21%

Volatility

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) at 2.69%. This indicates that 2B7K.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDMU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7K.DEEDMU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

2.69%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

7.80%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

11.93%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

15.55%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

17.39%

-1.21%

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7K.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EDMU.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7K.DE vs. EDMU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2B7K.DE nor EDMU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7K.DE and EDMU.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDMU.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.

2B7K.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for 2B7K.DE and 0.07% for EDMU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7K.DE and EDMU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer