PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with 2B7C.DE at 18.03% and ZPDI.DE at 18.03%.


2B7C.DE

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.76%
6M
12.15%
YTD
18.03%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*

ZPDI.DE

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.70%
6M
12.06%
YTD
18.03%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
18.03%6.93%23.74%13.77%-0.13%32.10%-0.53%32.25%-10.21%-2.64%
ZPDI.DE
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
18.03%6.82%23.74%13.82%-0.16%32.11%-0.48%32.04%-9.77%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7C.DE and ZPDI.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2017

0.99

The correlation between 2B7C.DE and ZPDI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7C.DE
2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDI.DE
ZPDI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ZPDI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2B7C.DEZPDI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.49

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

8.07

-0.07

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the ZPDI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7C.DE and ZPDI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.31%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPDI.DE drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7C.DE and ZPDI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7C.DEZPDI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.31%

-41.62%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-8.83%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.67%

-22.54%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.67%

-22.54%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-3.51%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-5.94%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.72%

+0.04%

Volatility

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDI.DE) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7C.DEZPDI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.90%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

11.76%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

15.11%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

16.80%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

20.52%

-0.31%

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2B7C.DE and ZPDI.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7C.DE vs. ZPDI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2B7C.DE nor ZPDI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, 2B7C.DE and ZPDI.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7C.DE and ZPDI.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while ZPDI.DE tracks S&P Industrials Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7C.DE and ZPDI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer