PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7C.DE achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly lower than WELT.DE's 15.23% return.


2B7C.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.50%
YTD
13.30%
6M
14.11%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*

WELT.DE

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.34%
YTD
15.23%
6M
15.49%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
13.30%6.91%23.72%13.89%4.68%
WELT.DE
Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
15.23%10.22%16.35%19.85%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7C.DE and WELT.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.85

The correlation between 2B7C.DE and WELT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7C.DE
2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

WELT.DE
WELT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
WELT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WELT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7C.DEWELT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.45

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

9.08

-1.48

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the WELT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7C.DE and WELT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7C.DEWELT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.52

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.26

-0.65

Drawdowns

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.33%, which is greater than WELT.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7C.DE and WELT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7C.DEWELT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.33%

-20.81%

-20.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-9.55%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-20.81%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.14%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-2.61%

-2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.58%

+0.17%

Volatility

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELT.DE) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7C.DEWELT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.88%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

12.34%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

15.36%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

15.32%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

15.32%

+4.03%

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WELT.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7C.DE vs. WELT.DE - Dividend Comparison

2B7C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM202520242023
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WELT.DE
Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
1.12%1.29%1.36%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7C.DE and WELT.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELT.DE.

2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while WELT.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Industrials. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7C.DE and 0.18% for WELT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7C.DE and WELT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer