2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE
2B7C.DE (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and LCHM.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - 2B7C.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials while LCHM.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Chemicals. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B7C.DE returned 13.22%/yr vs 6.53%/yr for LCHM.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 2B7C.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LCHM.DE.
Performance
2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B7C.DE achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly lower than LCHM.DE's 22.92% return.
2B7C.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- —
LCHM.DE
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 22.92%
- 6M
- 27.91%
- 1Y
- 34.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B7C.DE iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 13.30% | 6.91% | 23.72% | 13.89% | -0.20% | 32.19% | -0.63% | 32.20% | -10.13% | 4.44% |
LCHM.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc | 22.92% | 13.24% | -9.83% | 16.21% | -14.63% | 24.72% | 10.72% | 24.43% | -9.02% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B7C.DE and LCHM.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.55 |
The correlation between 2B7C.DE and LCHM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
2B7C.DE
LCHM.DE
2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B7C.DE | LCHM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.32 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.55 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 10.41 | -2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B7C.DE | LCHM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.91 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.36 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.47 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.33%, smaller than the maximum LCHM.DE drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7C.DE and LCHM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B7C.DE | LCHM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.33% | -47.72% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -13.34% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -24.12% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.66% | -24.60% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -1.74% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -8.36% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.24% | -0.49% |
Volatility
2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) is 3.74%, while Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that 2B7C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCHM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B7C.DE | LCHM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 6.63% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 14.76% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 17.86% | -3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 17.73% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 17.92% | +1.43% |
2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B7C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LCHM.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
2B7C.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B7C.DE nor LCHM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B7C.DE and LCHM.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B7C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B7C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LCHM.DE.
2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while LCHM.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Chemicals. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7C.DE and 0.30% for LCHM.DE.
Find the right allocation for 2B7C.DE and LCHM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer