2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE
2B7C.DE (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 2B7C.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while EUNL.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B7C.DE returned 13.22%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for EUNL.DE. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 2B7C.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B7C.DE achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly higher than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return.
2B7C.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B7C.DE iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 13.30% | 6.91% | 23.72% | 13.89% | -0.20% | 32.19% | -0.63% | 32.20% | -10.13% | 4.44% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 31.34% | -5.13% | 4.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B7C.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between 2B7C.DE and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
2B7C.DE
EUNL.DE
2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B7C.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 3.64 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 14.52 | -6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B7C.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.12 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.90 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.82 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.33%, which is greater than EUNL.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7C.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B7C.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.33% | -33.63% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -6.50% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -21.73% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.66% | -21.73% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.31% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -4.25% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 1.64% | +1.11% |
Volatility
2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that 2B7C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B7C.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 2.62% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 7.72% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 11.16% | +3.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 14.17% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 15.17% | +4.18% |
2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B7C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
2B7C.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B7C.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B7C.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B7C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B7C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
2B7C.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. 2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7C.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for 2B7C.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer