2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE
2B7C.DE (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and ESIN.DE (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Industrials Equities funds from iShares - 2B7C.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials while ESIN.DE tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B7C.DE returned 13.22%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for ESIN.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 2B7C.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIN.DE.
Performance
2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B7C.DE achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly higher than ESIN.DE's 8.75% return.
2B7C.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 13.30%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- 15.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B7C.DE iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 13.30% | 6.91% | 23.72% | 13.89% | -0.20% | 10.85% |
ESIN.DE iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 8.75% | 25.30% | 14.45% | 26.98% | -16.86% | 13.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B7C.DE and ESIN.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between 2B7C.DE and ESIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
2B7C.DE
ESIN.DE
2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B7C.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 1.16 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 4.21 | +3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B7C.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 0.78 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.67 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.70 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.33%, which is greater than ESIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7C.DE and ESIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B7C.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.33% | -29.12% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -13.11% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -18.30% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.66% | -29.12% | +6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -2.69% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -6.30% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.61% | -0.86% |
Volatility
2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) is 3.74%, while iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIN.DE) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that 2B7C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B7C.DE | ESIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 6.37% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 16.51% | -5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 19.60% | -5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 18.85% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 18.81% | +0.54% |
2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B7C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIN.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
2B7C.DE vs. ESIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B7C.DE nor ESIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B7C.DE and ESIN.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B7C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B7C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIN.DE.
2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while ESIN.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7C.DE and 0.18% for ESIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for 2B7C.DE and ESIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer