PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7C.DE achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly higher than DXSC.DE's 8.73% return.


2B7C.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.46%
YTD
13.30%
6M
14.07%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*

DXSC.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.46%
YTD
8.73%
6M
11.33%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
13.30%6.91%23.72%13.89%-0.20%32.19%-0.63%32.20%-10.13%4.44%
DXSC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
8.73%8.23%-1.25%18.77%-13.04%26.49%13.22%22.28%-12.90%14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7C.DE and DXSC.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.53

The correlation between 2B7C.DE and DXSC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7C.DE
2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DXSC.DE
DXSC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DXSC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7C.DEDXSC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.10

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

0.58

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

1.79

+5.80

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the DXSC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7C.DE and DXSC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7C.DEDXSC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.49

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.22

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.07

+0.54

Drawdowns

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.33%, smaller than the maximum DXSC.DE drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7C.DE and DXSC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7C.DEDXSC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.33%

-73.82%

+32.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-14.34%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-17.53%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

-25.63%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-1.80%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-30.18%

+25.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

4.61%

-1.86%

Volatility

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) is 3.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSC.DE) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that 2B7C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXSC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7C.DEDXSC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

6.43%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

14.24%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

16.91%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

17.98%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.35%

23.78%

-4.43%

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DXSC.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7C.DE vs. DXSC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2B7C.DE nor DXSC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7C.DE and DXSC.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DXSC.DE.

2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials, while DXSC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened 20-35. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7C.DE and 0.17% for DXSC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7C.DE and DXSC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer