2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE
2B7B.DE (iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 2B7B.DE is a Materials fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index, while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B7B.DE returned 5.89%/yr vs -1.29%/yr for EUNA.DE. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 2B7B.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B7B.DE achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.
2B7B.DE
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B7B.DE iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.98% | -1.07% | 5.24% | 8.58% | -7.10% | 39.56% | 8.41% | 25.77% | -11.22% | 1.13% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.46% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.36% | -13.52% | -2.37% | 3.70% | 5.06% | -1.17% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B7B.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, 2B7B.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
2B7B.DE
EUNA.DE
2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B7B.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.06 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.43 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 1.18 | +3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B7B.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.34 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | -0.28 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -0.05 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B7B.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7B.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B7B.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.61% | -17.79% | -16.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -2.75% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.54% | -4.02% | -20.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.54% | -17.03% | -7.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -8.66% | +6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -6.76% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 0.99% | +2.45% |
Volatility
2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that 2B7B.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B7B.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 1.35% | +3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | 2.82% | +9.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.43% | 3.46% | +11.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 4.64% | +12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 4.27% | +14.89% |
2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B7B.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
2B7B.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B7B.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B7B.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7B.DE.
2B7B.DE is categorized as Materials, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. 2B7B.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7B.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for 2B7B.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer