PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) and Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (6TVM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7B.DE achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly higher than 6TVM.DE's 11.44% return.


2B7B.DE

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
12.98%
6M
16.62%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*

6TVM.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
4.39%
YTD
11.44%
6M
10.76%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*
-9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B7B.DE
iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF
12.98%-1.07%5.24%8.58%-7.10%39.56%8.41%25.77%-11.22%6.42%
6TVM.DE
Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist
11.44%4.72%32.59%22.48%-14.18%40.78%-90.41%32.64%-2.54%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7B.DE and 6TVM.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between 2B7B.DE and 6TVM.DE has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7B.DE
2B7B.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
2B7B.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7B.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7B.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7B.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7B.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

6TVM.DE
6TVM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
6TVM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6TVM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
6TVM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
6TVM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
6TVM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) and Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (6TVM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7B.DE6TVM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.41

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.59

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

12.74

-8.05

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7B.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the 6TVM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7B.DE and 6TVM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7B.DE6TVM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.20

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.96

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.06

+0.50

Drawdowns

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7B.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, smaller than the maximum 6TVM.DE drawdown of -92.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7B.DE and 6TVM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7B.DE6TVM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-92.05%

+57.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-7.10%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.54%

-23.38%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.54%

-23.38%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-79.81%

+77.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-34.18%

+27.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.00%

+1.44%

Volatility

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist (6TVM.DE) at 2.61%. This indicates that 2B7B.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6TVM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7B.DE6TVM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

2.61%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

7.56%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

11.60%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

15.22%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

33.08%

-13.92%

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7B.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than 6TVM.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7B.DE vs. 6TVM.DE - Dividend Comparison

2B7B.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 6TVM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
2B7B.DE
iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
6TVM.DE
Amundi Core S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.77%0.86%1.21%0.95%2.04%0.93%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7B.DE and 6TVM.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 6TVM.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

6TVM.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7B.DE.

2B7B.DE is categorized as Materials, while 6TVM.DE is S&P 500. 2B7B.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index, while 6TVM.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7B.DE and 0.05% for 6TVM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7B.DE and 6TVM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer