PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7A.DE achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than IS20.DE's 9.38% return.


2B7A.DE

1D
-2.24%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
3.01%
6M
1.01%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*

IS20.DE

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.94%
YTD
9.38%
6M
8.09%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
2B7A.DE
iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
3.01%2.79%-2.27%
IS20.DE
iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc
9.38%6.77%6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7A.DE and IS20.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024

0.18

The correlation between 2B7A.DE and IS20.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7A.DE
2B7A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
2B7A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IS20.DE
IS20.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IS20.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS20.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS20.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IS20.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS20.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7A.DEIS20.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.35

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

2.35

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

7.30

-5.81

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the IS20.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7A.DE and IS20.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7A.DEIS20.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

2.02

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.77

-0.34

Drawdowns

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7A.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than IS20.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7A.DE and IS20.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7A.DEIS20.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-26.30%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-12.73%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.77%

-1.60%

-7.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-6.16%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

4.11%

+0.37%

Volatility

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to iShares S&P 500 Top 20 UCITS ETF USD Acc (IS20.DE) at 3.65%. This indicates that 2B7A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS20.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7A.DEIS20.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

3.65%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

10.03%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

14.81%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

19.57%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

19.57%

+0.08%

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7A.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IS20.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7A.DE vs. IS20.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2B7A.DE nor IS20.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7A.DE and IS20.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS20.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS20.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7A.DE.

2B7A.DE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IS20.DE is S&P 500. 2B7A.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities, while IS20.DE tracks S&P 500 Top 20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7A.DE and 0.10% for IS20.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7A.DE and IS20.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer