2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE
2B77.DE (iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - 2B77.DE tracks the iSTOXX® FactSet Ageing Population while XDWH.DE tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B77.DE returned 5.15%/yr vs 5.50%/yr for XDWH.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 2B77.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B77.DE achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return.
2B77.DE
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B77.DE iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF | 2.83% | 13.27% | 14.30% | 5.16% | -8.98% | 13.25% | 2.39% | 23.81% | -9.53% | 7.26% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B77.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between 2B77.DE and XDWH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
2B77.DE
XDWH.DE
2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B77.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.13 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.93 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | 2.28 | +6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B77.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.70 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.41 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B77.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B77.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B77.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -26.08% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | -10.32% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -21.12% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.07% | -21.12% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -8.51% | +6.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -4.82% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 4.20% | -2.19% |
Volatility
2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE) is 3.36%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that 2B77.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B77.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 4.81% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 9.51% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 13.69% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 13.43% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 14.69% | +1.83% |
2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B77.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
2B77.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B77.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B77.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B77.DE.
2B77.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Ageing Population, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 2B77.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for 2B77.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer