PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF (2B78.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B77.DE achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than 2B78.DE's 6.74% return.


2B77.DE

1D
0.34%
1M
5.65%
YTD
9.52%
6M
9.39%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*

2B78.DE

1D
1.35%
1M
8.85%
YTD
6.74%
6M
6.60%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B77.DE
iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF
9.52%13.28%14.40%5.16%-9.08%13.38%2.28%23.91%-9.63%7.38%
2B78.DE
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF
6.74%5.61%7.18%-0.29%-19.05%1.20%38.70%16.67%0.39%19.53%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B77.DE and 2B78.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016

0.82

The correlation between 2B77.DE and 2B78.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B77.DE
2B77.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
2B77.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B77.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B77.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
2B77.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B77.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

2B78.DE
2B78.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
2B78.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B78.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B78.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
2B78.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B78.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF (2B78.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2B77.DE2B78.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

2.30

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.40

5.65

+7.75

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B77.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the 2B78.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B77.DE and 2B78.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B77.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.55%, roughly equal to the maximum 2B78.DE drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B77.DE and 2B78.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B77.DE2B78.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.55%

-38.59%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.76%

-12.00%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-25.32%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

-37.03%

+16.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.68%

+11.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-15.27%

+8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

4.90%

-2.98%

Volatility

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE) is 3.17%, while iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF (2B78.DE) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that 2B77.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B78.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B77.DE2B78.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

5.25%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

12.04%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.13%

16.31%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

17.97%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

19.93%

-2.13%

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2B77.DE and 2B78.DE have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

2B77.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2B77.DE nor 2B78.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2B77.DE and 2B78.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B77.DE and 2B78.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

2B77.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Ageing Population, while 2B78.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Breakthrough Healthcare.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B77.DE and 2B78.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer