PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2B76.DE is traded in EUR, while CNDX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNDX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B76.DE achieves a 29.17% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's 18.66% return.


2B76.DE

1D
3.99%
1M
3.63%
YTD
29.17%
6M
29.54%
1Y
44.07%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*

CNDX.L

1D
3.09%
1M
1.04%
YTD
18.66%
6M
19.87%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
21.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B76.DE
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
29.17%4.50%12.12%35.00%-31.03%32.23%26.14%41.93%-15.52%29.41%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
18.66%5.54%34.77%51.53%-29.37%37.49%36.03%41.08%3.56%15.70%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B76.DE and CNDX.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016

0.79

The correlation between 2B76.DE and CNDX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B76.DE
2B76.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
2B76.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B76.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B76.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
2B76.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B76.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2B76.DECNDX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.50

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

10.18

-0.12

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B76.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B76.DE and CNDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B76.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.50%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -31.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B76.DE and CNDX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B76.DECNDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.50%

-31.43%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-10.26%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.47%

-25.93%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.50%

-31.43%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.74%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-5.36%

-4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

3.53%

+0.69%

Volatility

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) at 5.98%. This indicates that 2B76.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B76.DECNDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

5.98%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.04%

12.57%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.53%

16.87%

+5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.97%

20.71%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.42%

20.40%

+2.02%

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B76.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

2B76.DE vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2B76.DE nor CNDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2B76.DE and CNDX.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNDX.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNDX.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B76.DE.

2B76.DE is categorized as Robotics, while CNDX.L is Nasdaq-100. 2B76.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while CNDX.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 2B76.DE and 0.33% for CNDX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B76.DE and CNDX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer