2AMZ.L vs. 3MSE.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

2AMZ.L (Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP) and 3MSE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 2AMZ.L tracks the NYSE Leveraged 2x AMZN Index while 3MSE.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index. Both are passively managed. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

2AMZ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

2AMZ.L is traded in GBp, while 3MSE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3MSE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

2AMZ.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -13.06%
• YTD: 11.22%
• 6M: 11.83%
• 1Y: 20.44%
• 3Y*: 29.23%
• 5Y*: -0.23%
• 10Y*: —

3MSE.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

2AMZ.L vs. 3MSE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2AMZ.L

2AMZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 16
2AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
2AMZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
2AMZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
2AMZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
2AMZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2AMZ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Microsoft ETP EUR (3MSE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2AMZ.L	3MSE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.01	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2AMZ.L	3MSE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	2AMZ.L	3MSE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.80%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.10%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	2AMZ.L	3MSE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.33%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.85%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.46%	—	—

2AMZ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2AMZ.L and 3MSE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

2AMZ.L vs. 3MSE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2AMZ.L nor 3MSE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, 2AMZ.L or 3MSE.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 2AMZ.L or 3MSE.L?

2AMZ.L and 3MSE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

What is the main difference between 2AMZ.L and 3MSE.L?

2AMZ.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x AMZN Index, while 3MSE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X MSFT Index.