2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L
2AMZ.L (Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP) and 3BP.L (Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 2AMZ.L tracks the NYSE Leveraged 2x AMZN Index while 3BP.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x BP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2AMZ.L returned 0.03%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for 3BP.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2AMZ.L achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly lower than 3BP.L's 75.30% return.
2AMZ.L
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -15.30%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 6M
- 13.88%
- 1Y
- 27.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- —
3BP.L
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -16.33%
- YTD
- 75.30%
- 6M
- 37.46%
- 1Y
- 168.94%
- 3Y*
- -2.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- —
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2AMZ.L Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP | 11.26% | -18.82% | 83.06% | 165.76% | -80.00% | 18.84% |
3BP.L Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX | 75.30% | 16.83% | -49.99% | -15.24% | 58.02% | -4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2AMZ.L and 3BP.L is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2021 | 0.02 |
The correlation between 2AMZ.L and 3BP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
2AMZ.L
3BP.L
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
2AMZ.L
3BP.L
-
Basic Materials
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Communication Services
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Energy
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
Financial Services
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Healthcare
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Industrials
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Real Estate
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Technology
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Utilities
2AMZ.L
-
3BP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L — Risk / Return Rank
2AMZ.L
3BP.L
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2AMZ.L | 3BP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.31 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 4.23 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 11.67 | -10.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2AMZ.L | 3BP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 1.98 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.06 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.06 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2AMZ.L drawdown since its inception was -84.11%, roughly equal to the maximum 3BP.L drawdown of -85.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2AMZ.L and 3BP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2AMZ.L | 3BP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.11% | -85.47% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.87% | -39.67% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.29% | -82.48% | +27.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.11% | -85.47% | +1.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.39% | -46.91% | +18.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.82% | -43.64% | +4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.13% | 14.42% | +5.71% |
Volatility
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) is 18.03%, while Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) has a volatility of 29.33%. This indicates that 2AMZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2AMZ.L | 3BP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.03% | 29.33% | -11.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.46% | 74.08% | -27.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.35% | 84.97% | -24.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.33% | 89.78% | -21.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.70% | 90.19% | -17.49% |
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 2AMZ.L and 3BP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
2AMZ.L vs. 3BP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2AMZ.L nor 3BP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2AMZ.L and 3BP.L have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2AMZ.L and 3BP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
2AMZ.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x AMZN Index, while 3BP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x BP Index.
Find the right allocation for 2AMZ.L and 3BP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer