PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2AMZ.L achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than 2AMD.L's 300.00% return.


2AMZ.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-13.06%
YTD
11.22%
6M
11.83%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
29.23%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*

2AMD.L

1D
-4.98%
1M
31.06%
YTD
300.00%
6M
276.53%
1Y
944.07%
3Y*
65.48%
5Y*
42.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
2AMZ.L
Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP
11.22%-18.82%83.06%165.76%-80.00%0.95%49.72%
2AMD.L
Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP
300.00%82.40%-49.88%285.12%-86.24%111.82%136.69%

Correlation

The correlation between 2AMZ.L and 2AMD.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.45

The correlation between 2AMZ.L and 2AMD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
2AMZ.L
2AMD.L

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

2AMZ.L
100.0%
2AMD.L

-

Basic Materials

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Communication Services

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Energy

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Financial Services

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Healthcare

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Industrials

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Real Estate

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Technology

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L
100.0%

Utilities

2AMZ.L

-

2AMD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2AMZ.L
2AMZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
2AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

2AMD.L
2AMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
2AMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2AMZ.L2AMD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.57

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

16.98

-16.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.01

33.39

-32.38

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the 2AMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2AMZ.L and 2AMD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2AMZ.L2AMD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

7.51

-7.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.01

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.01

+0.21

Drawdowns

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2AMZ.L drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, smaller than the maximum 2AMD.L drawdown of -99.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2AMZ.L and 2AMD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2AMZ.L2AMD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.20%

-99.50%

+15.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.87%

-55.04%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.29%

-89.49%

+34.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.20%

-99.50%

+15.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.80%

-90.65%

+61.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.10%

-70.83%

+34.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.15%

28.04%

-7.89%

Volatility

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) is 17.93%, while Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) has a volatility of 43.90%. This indicates that 2AMZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2AMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2AMZ.L2AMD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.93%

43.90%

-25.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.46%

85.97%

-39.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.33%

124.49%

-64.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.85%

4,317.39%

-4,248.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.46%

3,940.06%

-3,872.60%

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2AMZ.L and 2AMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2AMZ.L vs. 2AMD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2AMZ.L nor 2AMD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2AMZ.L and 2AMD.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2AMZ.L and 2AMD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2AMZ.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x AMZN Index, while 2AMD.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X AMD Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2AMZ.L and 2AMD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer